Competition Systems Reflection

Submit this reflection to your instructor. Do not enter it into CourseOS.

Write one or two complete paragraphs. Explain what makes a competitive result credible. Use at least two Unit 01 words—such as competitive integrity, roster, organizer, or escalation path—correctly in context.

Your response must include:

1. one idea you understand now that you did not understand at the start of the week;
2. evidence from your event system card, timeline, or class discussion;
3. one rule, decision, or responsibility that could fail in a poorly run event; and
4. one question you still have or one next investigation you would make.

Do not write “rules are important.” Tell the reader which rule, who owns it, and what changes when it is missing. Confidence is not evidence.